Giorgio tsoukalos single dating Chat for sex without sign up

Though I was not present, I do have in my possession the complete video footage of the 2007 Smithsonian session, and I can assure anyone, and will make available if needed, sections of this tape (it is many hours long) that will show a radically different nature of this session than what White pretends the meeting was all about.Let me note that White was not present and has never seen this footage.” I leave it up to Giorgio Tsoukalos to defend himself, but it is clear that he means here that we’ve labeled them giants, but that maybe we should call them extraterrestrial instead.Yet White interprets this statement to say that Tsoukalos is claiming the word Nephilim has been mistranslated as giants and should be instead translated as extraterrestrial! But my point is that the word means big, and the context of the stories support that idea, their height is mentioned etc.He never wanted anyone to know about the auction or that letter.In your article you also say that no one knows where Burney got the skull 10 years prior, obviously trying to make room for Anna’s story, but that’s not entirely true.

Its history is full of greed and lies, and it genuineness could only be accepted by the most dedicated devotee given the facts we now know.” This is simply not true.Burney obtained his crystal skull in early 1933, as attested in a letter he wrote on Burney Gallery stationary to the director of the American Museum of Natural History in February of that year (AMNH 2/17/1933): “I have just acquired a life-size rock crystal skull with separate jaw, from Mexico, and I shall be glad to know if it is of interest to you or your museum.” It should be noted that Mitchell Hedges claimed he found it in Belize not Mexico, it should also be noted that J. Braunholz of the British Museum said that he saw it in a shop in London before Hedges or Burney bought it, according to J. When you take in to account that the British museum skull is a fake, and the Mitchell hedges skull is basically an exact copy of that one, adding to that that it has been determined that the MHS does have tool marks on it, that this issue is decided, it’s a losing battle, get out while you can.Giorgio Tsoukalos says: “Were they giants or is that the wrong word and [should] the correct word be an extraterrestrial?Perhaps I should have said “Anna Mitchell-Hedges never allowed for any testing that would prove the skull was a fake.” Because she did allow the HP test, which I have already described basically as nothing better than a PR stunt which had no bearing on its validity, nor could it have.Some of the other claims he makes in this section, that Mitchell-Hedges lied about the origins of how he acquired the skull, are true.

Leave a Reply